Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to that arrogant oligarchy who merely happen to be walking around.
Orthodoxy, G. K. Chesterton
Quick List
- Homepage: myCatholic.com
- AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!
- Best of the Web (James Taranto)
- Catholic World News
- The Corner at National Review
- Dallas weather
- Edmonton weather
- Five Feet of Fury
- LifeSite News
- SteynOnline
Highly Recommended
(I met my husband here!)
Catholic/Christian
- Jimmy Akin
- Bettnet - Domenico Bettinelli
- Catholic and Enjoying It!
- Curt Jester
- EWTN
- Get Religion
- Godspy: Faith at the Edge
- The Vatican
Can-Con
Genealogy
- Access Genealogy - Free Genealogy Resources
- The Alden Kindred
- Ancestry.com
- Mac Genealogy.org (Mac software)
- RootsWeb
Home-Making and Whatnot
Literary and Cultural
- Republic of Pemberley
- G. K. Chesterton The Colossal Genius
- Cookie Monster's Analysis of Shakespeare
- Something Awful (NSFW)
Politics and Current Events
- Captain's Quarters
- Coalition for Darfur
- Protein Wisdom
- Professor Bainbridge
- Rantings of a Sandmonkey
Reference
Previous Posts
- He's big in . . . Albania?
- What is today?
- Sorry, guys, Aish is taken
- Well, at least now Simon won't have to quit Idol
- More Steyn on the Black trial
- BLT a la Meg
- The i-Kia
- Cardinal Stickler, 97, celebrates 70th anniversary...
- If Ahmadinejad didn't like the movie . . .
- If you're not from Dallas, I bet you didn't know this
Archives
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- April 2008
(I met my husband here!)
1 Comments:
Hi Meg,
I see you're blogging again. The wife and I just got back from Chicago. I hope you're doing well.
Well, I think I've been at pains on your site to make sure that I have expressed my appreciation for the Catholic Church even though I am not a Catholic.
Let me hasten to say that the clergy have more trouble with me than they do atheists, because I simply regard Protestant and Catholic clergy as both being legitimate heirs to the Christian tradition, and I am equally comfortable with the idea that either could be my pastor. (I find they simply don't know how to react to this... you know, it's all one big fight in which someone has to win, and the choice has to be made... sorry, I'm perfectly happy with both of you.)
Now having stated the above, I have to say that this annulment issue and even particularly with the current situation (I read what's happening to Kathy Shaidle) is simply one of those issues that dissuades many Protestants from taking a closer look at the Catholic Church.
Who among us hasn't known crazy situations that have arisen because of this annulment process, and even when there are children involved. As much as I admire the Catholic Church (somebody once told me my problem is that I prefer Catholic practice and Protestant theology), I confess to having enormous disapproval for Vatican bureaucrats who so carelessly stick to their theoretical guns when real people already belabored have to undergo such emotionally traumatic experiences.
And now that in the Kennedy case there has been an eccleciastical reversal, it smacks of the worst kind of Kafkaesque nightmare that bureaucracies can grant to the priviliged. This kind of thing hurts the Church's reputation year and after, and why they don't stop it and come to a more realistic and considered practice is beyond my ken...
-- Greg in Dallas
Post a Comment
<< Home